Study Reveals Devastating Impact of Forced Separation Between People and Their Pets
A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Anthrozoös reveals the devastating consequences of forced separation between pets and their owners during domestic violence, homelessness, and natural disasters.
By Richard Cole · January 29, 2024
Pet owners grappling with domestic violence, homelessness, or natural disasters are confronting a glaring lack of support services, exacerbating risks to their safety and psychological well-being, according to a groundbreaking 27-year international research review published in the peer-reviewed journal Anthrozoös.
The study, conducted by James Cook University’s PhD candidate Jasmine Montgomery, along with Associate Professors Janice Lloyd and Zhanming Liang, sheds light on the increased vulnerabilities faced by individuals forced to separate from their pets in times of crisis. The emotional bond between humans and animals, revealed in the study, significantly impacts mental health and poses risks to overall well-being and safety.
"Our results reveal the strong emotional attachment between people and animals may result in vulnerability for both in circumstances where this bond is threatened."
The research, based in Australia, analyzed 42 studies focused on the human-animal bond and situations of separation involving domestic violence, homelessness, and natural disasters. Shockingly, the review confirmed that cases of domestic violence often resulted in maltreatment and death for pets.
Montgomery emphasized the reluctance of individuals to flee domestic violence situations due to a lack of support for pets. “In a lot of cases of domestic violence, there is evidence to suggest that people will delay leaving their relationship to protect their pet.” She also stated that the threat to pets is often used by the perpetrator to lure back the victims exacerbating the risk to their safety.
The study also underscored challenges during natural disasters, with pet owners risking their safety to return for their animals. The review highlighted systemic supports that embedded human “superiority” and disparities in responsibilities for pet welfare, emphasizing the need for a shift in mindset.
The authors called for a reevaluation of crisis planning, suggesting that pets be included in services assisting individuals facing domestic violence. They proposed providing housing for women, children, and pets together, enhancing natural disaster evacuation plans to accommodate both people and their pets, and ensuring pet-friendly accommodation for those experiencing homelessness.
"This study is a crucial resource for professionals and organizations dedicated to addressing the challenges of forced separation, emphasizing the importance of considering pets in crisis planning and service provision,"
While the study contributes valuable insights, the authors acknowledge limitations, such as a focus on English-language peer-reviewed articles, potentially overlooking diverse cultural perspectives, and the complexity of animal-related keywords leading to the potential omission of relevant articles.